Florian Posted October 21, 2016 Report Share Posted October 21, 2016 2 hours ago, Barthel said: Florian if the "acht-acht" is implemented it would be far more devasting then the self propelled AA. And that's historically speaking too. The problem would be creating the unit itself because it was usually always towed behind a half track because of its weight. Luckily in emergency situations(with the later, heavier carriage) the 88 can fire without having to be deployed but it's far more accurate and effective when given the two and a half minutes to deploy each of its axles and take aim at a target. I personally love the 88 since the Tigers turret has the 88 cannon as its main armament. Badass much? Badass a lot 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supehooman Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 7 hours ago, Barthel said: Florian if the "acht-acht" is implemented it would be far more devasting then the self propelled AA. And that's historically speaking too. The problem would be creating the unit itself because it was usually always towed behind a half track because of its weight. Luckily in emergency situations(with the later, heavier carriage) the 88 can fire without having to be deployed but it's far more accurate and effective when given the two and a half minutes to deploy each of its axles and take aim at a target. I personally love the 88 since the Tigers turret has the 88 cannon as its main armament. Badass much? That was the balancing thing I said (LC armerment) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supehooman Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 On September 22, 2016 at 1:44 AM, Barthel said: Flak 36/37 being produced in limited numbers and capable of the dual role for Anti-Tank and Anti-Air. Imagine seeing a city with a defense matrix of just a couple 8.8mm flaks setup around causing the incoming formations do scatter and reform. I think it's time we, well the devs, implement one of the true dual role devastators for the time period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florian Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 27 minutes ago, Supehooman said: Repeat? Nice 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supehooman Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 34 minutes ago, Florian said: Repeat? Nice When u need to say something you have to say it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barthel Posted October 22, 2016 Report Share Posted October 22, 2016 Very classy sir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supehooman Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 (edited) What about an attack helicopter (I sexually identify as one) Edited October 23, 2016 by Supehooman Not serious! Don't get triggered by the suggestion just satire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barthel Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 I reject your reality and substitute my own. Lul myth busters GAU 8 ANYONE? 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florian Posted October 23, 2016 Report Share Posted October 23, 2016 13 hours ago, Barthel said: I reject your reality and substitute my own. Lul myth busters GAU 8 ANYONE? 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrMinyMe Posted October 28, 2016 Report Share Posted October 28, 2016 (edited) I think that right now it takes to long for anti tank guns to get to destinations, so maybe this sweet baby the Jagdpanther(tank destroyer)would be a great addition to the game Edited October 28, 2016 by MrMinyMe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieRightNow2 Posted October 31, 2016 Report Share Posted October 31, 2016 Montana battleship, Atlanta cruiser, etc. so many types of ships in WW1 + WW2 yet so little in the game Montana battleship, Atlanta cruiser, etc. so many types of ships in WW1 + WW2 yet so little in the game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moab Posted December 4, 2016 Report Share Posted December 4, 2016 On 10/15/2016 at 1:53 PM, Outlaw85 said: The City turrets are actually this here. They were known to be extremely hard to destroy and the few that got destroyed where by ground forces at night time. If you want to know more look up the history of German Flak Tower. Here is the link to learn more and why they are using this.https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flak_tower. Bottom picture is the League City Turrets. Hope you all Enjoy this.. That's pretty cool Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Supehooman Posted December 5, 2016 Report Share Posted December 5, 2016 I want a mig 17 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davados Posted December 6, 2016 Report Share Posted December 6, 2016 I think AT guns should be able to attack Vehicles - the fact that Recon Jeeps and Stugs are unable to be targeted is very odd! i don't think it would be too game breaking either to let them target them. Either way, infantry are servery underused, would love to have some good infantry in game, Commandos perhaps? Regular infantry that have a higher attack against buildings? Also i think the Bismark should be a league unit - just saying otherwise, maybe some submarines? can only attack ships again subs would be a league unit. For buildings would LOVE to see a coastal gun be able to be built along side a turret for Harbors. Can only attack ships, but range is 350 perhaps. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MkV Posted December 7, 2016 Report Share Posted December 7, 2016 I'd like to see a tactical bomber (Stuka or the other country equivalents) that have the anti vehicle/ anti ship stats of the strategic bomber, but a low building damage. Then the strategic bomber should have its attack rating vs everything except buildings reduced drastically. The medium can continue being meh vs everything. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TadPaul01 Posted December 31, 2016 Report Share Posted December 31, 2016 Some sort of halftrack, easy to get early in the game that can move around infantry and AA/AT/arty a little faster than normal and maybe even defend itself Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SargeZ Posted February 19, 2017 Report Share Posted February 19, 2017 I see there are a lot of people here that know about the different types of weapons used during WWII. It seems to me that when we make suggestions to admin. It ppears that admin blows off a lot that is said by the serious players, and listens more to the casual player, who spends very limited time learning the game and its mechanics. I have had the privilege to learn from two great players MkV and SnakeEater both who belong to WeFew. The reason is I have taken the time to ask and learn. I have heard players whine that this troop is too strong or that troop is too weak. Seems to me they just don't know how to counter with that troop. Learn the game. Admin please stop nerfing great armaments so that causal players can win with out learn the game or trying to learn the game. Sorry if I put this in the wrong forum just tired of seeing good armaments being destroyed and from what appears to me to be a one sidedness of admin. 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moab Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 On 2/19/2017 at 5:25 PM, SargeZ said: I see there are a lot of people here that know about the different types of weapons used during WWII. It seems to me that when we make suggestions to admin. It ppears that admin blows off a lot that is said by the serious players, and listens more to the casual player, who spends very limited time learning the game and its mechanics. I have had the privilege to learn from two great players MkV and SnakeEater both who belong to WeFew. The reason is I have taken the time to ask and learn. I have heard players whine that this troop is too strong or that troop is too weak. Seems to me they just don't know how to counter with that troop. Learn the game. Admin please stop nerfing great armaments so that causal players can win with out learn the game or trying to learn the game. Sorry if I put this in the wrong forum just tired of seeing good armaments being destroyed and from what appears to me to be a one sidedness of admin. I'd have to agree with you there... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derrick321 Posted February 24, 2017 Report Share Posted February 24, 2017 There needs to be a submarine, the first naval lc armament. 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieRightNow2 Posted March 2, 2017 Report Share Posted March 2, 2017 I think their should be missle armaments, V1s and V2s, V1s would be in your normal base while the V2s are unlocked in LC Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.