Jump to content
World Warfare
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt


  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Everything posted by BlueMingo

  1. I have not played the game in a few months as I got bored with 1/3 full maps and either crushing the enemy or getting crushed by large groups. My ID number should tell you something about how long I have been around. I started this map yesterday for first time and Think map has some very good ideas, but needs some more thought. Smaller number of players per map is great in my opinion, with rebel city shields this does allow most people to,join and survive atleast the first day or so, even if solo, but I would like to see this map only allow tac help,from league mates not allies. This would limit the alt account use from battle support, which we all know has become standard for anyone over 3k hours in the game. Everyone uses them so let’s just admit that.. this would make alt use less attractive other than to,cap a city prior to shields expiring for rebels. Good idea here and nice to see some thought being put into the game, you all really need a publicity push tho to attract more players. I think right now you got the same 1000 or so people playing all the time and the rest of us just cannon fodder.. keep,digging and working Nice to see. Thanks for the efforts BlueMingo ID 38318
  2. Well post was made days ago and still no mod or game rep response. Guess they really don’t read this stuff
  3. Agree, I just entered a globe BF that is 30hrs OLD!!!!! That is not acceptable. How is a small league or solo player to even compete for more than the 8hr shield period when this happens? There are not enough new players coming into game to fill maps on a regular basis at a consistent time frame. Especially when there are sometime 4 different maps going at once. I am among the players that have paid for generals to enhance the game play and enjoy the game overall, but come on! This happens way too often... here is a challenge to game mods and devs.. post a reply here that you have read this and at least say you are aware of the issue. Is this being discussed?
  4. I am kinda tired of having to search random chats or topics for issue answers and believe that there should be a bug topic specific to each update. Perhaps there is and I just am not smart enough to find it, either way here goes. 1- new chat is not scaled/formatted correct for Apple iPhone or iPad, messages run off screen and often last word is cut partially off. 2- troop HP loss after researching in BF tech has NOT been fixed, It actually is worse... All troops in gigs, or aircraft in airstrip lose boosted HP every day or so. 3-often there is no alert or notice that a new message has been posted. Guess it might be better than there always being an alert even when no message... will post more issues as they come up, anyone else having same issues
  5. Lol, Compensation. Here fellas, I know u all just lost 70 troops of M40s and whirlybirds and strats, but hey accidents happen. Here is hmmmm... 500 Nice purple gems u can use which will save you 30mins of your lovely 4-5hr rebuild.. enjoy and thanks for playing...
  6. BlueMingo

    Wtf game

    Had this issue last Cup battle, and award didn't drop for awhile. Curious was the city pacified?
  7. Okay, So I bought a couple Generals. Can u make the Thanksgiving I on go away. It is really annoying that it stays on BF screen even after viewed and a purchase made. It also is a view blocker as it is not stacked in a column on right side of screen but in a row extending into battlefield line of view. Please think that one through and fix for next time. Thanks
  8. BlueMingo

    Permission help

    Okay, so for the last 3 BFs our league has had issues with permissions of members in BF. Only the CiC has been able to approve new members or decline new members. Attached is a screen shot of access denied and another of me being set as BF officer. Am I missing something or is this broke. Thanks We have also experienced issues launching new battlefields lately also where we have to change league commander in chief because after opening the form team for BF the Cic's start tab grays out. We have to ask whose is yellow and give them leader. Any suggestions or is this a known issue.
  9. I will no longer comment....lol
  10. The rules don't say this is specifically for the true fanatic and radical crap, sir it says "No insulting, racist, or obscene language". Racist is easy to identify and hard the defend, obscene again fairly easy to identify and deal with. But Insulting is not always easy to identify and people will use these new rules whenever they do t like what they read. Sorry that you seem to have been the victim in some manner previously, but my comments are meant to point out that overly broad rules, that are not defined lead to trouble. I have no issue with the punishments etc as that is clear to understand, but some comments can be interpreted differently by many people. This is a great game, but I still say it will be interesting to see how this gets enforced and what the comments are that get people in trouble. Example: I find the name "Hitler" and any variation of it Insulting to use in a game based on WWII it also is racist and everyone who has it should be ban., I also find the references in game to SS soldiers offensive and would like them changed to PU soldiers (pink unicorns).. once this starts where does it end? Maybe we need digital hand shakes and hugs after each BF also.
  11. I will be interested to see this enforced and how it works out, because these rules are very broad n scope. Some people are more sensitive than others. I agree that aggressive comms can be at times over board, but I guess telling people they are no good and should go back to playing pokeymon, could now be considered insulting and rude. Thus resulting in a ban..? I do enjoy the occasional banter with other players, so can I get a list of approved phrases or words I can use? Also let me know if this post offends anyone, as it seems the PC police have now found World Warfare Chat..
  12. Lol, chat is everyone's new "safe place"
  13. So when is the chat bug gonna get fixed? I can't post anything more than 40 characters long that doesn't error out. Really frustrating when trying to coordinate attacks and can't chat, or message post 10 mins after sent. I think some diamonds are in order for this....
  14. Tons of bugs.. And glitches in this new release.
  15. The numbers 1 though 10 are just bullet item numbers. However 3- 3-1, 5-1, 10-1 all fair odds I will roll this way every time if I could. The less losses I take the better, and it means more teamwork this would have been better said, 3: 3vs1, 5vs1, or 10vs1 are all fair odds...........
  16. BlueMingo


    Is that the bridge to yodenhiem?
  17. Okay, so after my return to the game and now playing my 3rd battlefield since that return; I have noticed something while reading the BF chat convos and watching the dialogue unfold. There are people in this game that want their safe space, they feel bullied when 5 people from the same league show up to destroy everything they built for the last 3 days, and will digitally scream and name call others because they are losing. I have my own very strong opinions about the pacification of our youth with safe spaces and the I shall not be offended environments. But a game where killing, teamwork, and takeover, are major components is not one of those places. People many of them young adults, should not be playing this type of game if they don't ( mind) having their stuff wrecked. It amazes me how people get so wrapped up in games that they feel personally attacked or slighted when they are losing ground. I am not sure why this is shocking, but can anyone tell me why when a player or league takes over a city and destroys 95-100% of the targets troops and building, that 1- the attackers cheated, 2- it was a 5 on 1 and is unfair, 3- they all suc(k) and 4 - that the target has to enter chat and leave not so nice messages.( did I miss this in the gamers handbook?) now there are some leagues and players out there who use tactics to win ( you Chinese players know who are) that are somewhat questionable, yet still allowed. If you don't like it find a new BF or destroy those players early on and problems solved. So in my own not so nice typing this is for ( any of you participation trophy, safe space loving, unfair complaining, gem hating) people to understand how I will be playing this game 1- my league leaders are the ones who will decide friend or foe 2- neutral... What? you are either with us or against us. No Switzerland here. 3- 3-1, 5-1, 10-1 all fair odds I will roll this way every time if I could. The less losses I take the better, and it means more teamwork 4- kill quick kill fast, their is no rule that says you have to allow players to build up before attacking them 5- gems, this game gives free gems everyday.. It is okay to us them as you see fit, although this is a free game, it was made to make money so stop hating people who spend money. ( I will admit I just spent my first ever $10 on this game and bought Patton) people it is equal to 4 cups of Starbucks or in my case 16 jelly donuts. I will diet next week as a result. 6- it isn't personal folks just a game 7- I play to win or don't play 8- if you wreck me good on ya mate... I will learn from it, or just go cry in a corner, but I wont be telling how you bad you are. 9- if game is decided I will 1v1 anyone on a neutral tile, as I can't take troops with me to next BF and look at all the stuff we can learn tactic wise. 10- have fun..
  18. Love, the progress this game has made.. 8 months ago, Imcouldnt load troops into a transport plane with them disappearing, you couldn't put troops in league mates base without them having to kick them out. The changes and improvements have brought me back to the game, and it appears Devs are on the right course. So great Job until I find something else to complain about, and beware of the big boot.
  19. Lol Fran, you know he would be trying drop that on you all game., while you are shooting down my planes with AA
  20. Douglas Dive Bomber WWII, with a 500 lb bomb. Gruman, Torpedo plane WWII.
  21. Couple of Furies members, I believe Colombia and BlueMingo prepping enemy LC for attack.
  22. Not sure what you are referring to as "rockets?" During WWII, and especially in the pacific theater there most certainly were dive Bombers and Torpedo plane squadrons. Today's high speed torpedo rockets didn't exist, but propeller driven ones did. Many many ships were sunk by Torpedos and crippled by Dive bombers during WWII...
  23. Would be nice, if fighters could be outfitted, once they land on a carrier. And converted to torpedo or dive bomber. That way they wouldn't have to develop a new plane, just adapt it to specialty roles. Only way to make a torpedo or,dive bomber would be to land it on a carrier then convert it once carrier is at say Lv 2 for torpedo, Lv 3 for,dive bomber. Give some incentive to make carriers and expand them.
  24. Hey, if we are going to have a map where naval warfare is a vital part of the battle, than aircraft carriers should be able to produce torpedo planes. That specialize in sinking ships.....
  25. Well I have read many of the posts here ( not all but many) and will say that although I don't like all of the new features and have experienced many of the issues with lagging game play, frozen planes, troops that do the cha cha, and even go on random death walkabouts, I have seen progress made over the last few days, on most complaints. This atleast means that someone is reading this forum from the game and developers are trying to find solutions. For those who don't think anything is being done, they are wrong and for those who don't like the changes, keep letting people know. Not everything is going to be perfect during the first few days or weeks and this game is a strategical challenge not a " hey I figured out how to kill everything with arty and defending AA". So with that let me provide my opinions on the game thus far ( several of these have been commented on by other already) Overall I like the thought process of making the game better and like the research system put in place. But I do see the potential for players unless separated by some type of development ranking to quickly destroy any new players to the game. This same ranking system needs to be considered for leagues and kinda is but still needs to be factored in when allowing players to join games. Again that is a 00011010100110100011001010 type code problem, that all you over paid smart guys can deal with. next I hate the tap tap of bubbles. Drives me nuts and takes away from blowing stuff up so I can get the all it BP. I saw some post about giving us a button we could push once and collect for all. I like it! Arty comments, I agree that arty has been big time Nerf'd and probably too much, but agree some reduction is good. I say range 280 while not letting turrets get 300 range til level 7 or 8 that way arty can still kill lower level cities or turrets with out being in kill box, and force players to defend a little. With that said I love the new stugs and tank comb with arty support and for all you arty lovers out there no war was ever been won with arty alone that is why it is a combat support weapon and not front line attack weapon. No city in history that I am aware of ever surrendered to arty with 1 infantry platoon. Combined arms assault is where this game needs to be. Also to the damage done by arty, Imagree the damage done to armor should have been reduced but the damage done to stone and brick building, should not have been Nerf'd as much. Should take 30 minutes to kill a lv5 village (not city)with 6 arty. Build times. I see I can build up to lv 10 or 20 with armory and airstrip. Great but you can't repair a plane til level 3 or 5 and it take 1 hr just get to level 2 reduced build times for airstrips and naval yards needs to be considered. Longer than ground troops but it is ridiculous now. Also we are 4 plus days into my battle and There is no way I could ever build out lv 20 airstrips. Please review this setup resource collection, yup I have had this issue and for some reason it is always in the morning hours. Sometimes I collect sometimes I don't. I know this is being worked on Fix the attack button! If I can see it I should be able to attack it! If my troops aren't in range they should move to range. Also when rebels or enemy troops move within range my troops sometimes move to there last kill location stop this. I don't give my troops that discretion. What do you think this is the modern army? has the hold position button ever worked for anyone? Mine is still broke.lol troops don't like to enter bases sometimes. Who knows they cray cray. how about creating troop lines American, Russian, Germany etc. rather than the hodge podge we have now. Then players could select their troop type at start of battlefield. I know more complex coding. please do something about reward system and make it more player specific. If I plat more I should get more. overall still a good game but this update is requiring a relearning and we all know that we generally hate change. I understand the frustration as I almost called it quits twice in last 2 days. But then I realize it is a game, meant to be fun, and a challenge. Keep up the solid work staff, and get this game right. Thanks Mingo
  • Create New...