DevilDog3 Posted March 21, 2018 Report Share Posted March 21, 2018 What do you feel is the best General to place in the League acity and why? I have tried a few a few different ones, but was hoping to get your collective perspective / thoughts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Immel Posted March 21, 2018 Report Share Posted March 21, 2018 The entire concept of LC Generals is clearly designed to benefit the league as a whole over the actual member who places his Officer into an LC. So which officer is placed in the LC should be a league decision. This decision is dependent on league strategy and long term objectives. If for instance resources are very important for your league most of the BF; then the generals that offer extra resource output such as Winston, Zhukov, Knusden, etc should be your priority. Its impossible to answer your question unless you clearly define for us your league objectives. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DevilDog3 Posted March 22, 2018 Author Report Share Posted March 22, 2018 I was looking for a wide set of perspectives as everyone’s opinions are slated towards how they play. I know the ones I most often use, but thought I would pose the question to gather other players perspectives. Understanding the benefit of a specific general like Rommel versus a more varied General like MacArthur that helps more types of gear, but at a lower percentage. This exercise is about cost benefit and each persons perspective as we are far greater when we bring in others thoughts. Thanks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Immel Posted March 22, 2018 Report Share Posted March 22, 2018 Well that is the point I am trying to bring across; that it shouldn’t be based on a single person’s perspective, but on the overall league perspective, if you want to have the most efficient choices possible that benefit the league as a whole. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Panzerwerfer42 Posted April 28, 2018 Report Share Posted April 28, 2018 On 3/22/2018 at 8:46 AM, DevilDog3 said: I was looking for a wide set of perspectives as everyone’s opinions are slated towards how they play. I know the ones I most often use, but thought I would pose the question to gather other players perspectives. Understanding the benefit of a specific general like Rommel versus a more varied General like MacArthur that helps more types of gear, but at a lower percentage. This exercise is about cost benefit and each persons perspective as we are far greater when we bring in others thoughts. Thanks Without giving away strategy, expensive officers that boost a lot of stats at a smaller % are far better than cheaper officers that are specific but share a higher percentage. If you can’t figure out why, that’s your problem. To me understanding why is more important, because you will understand how to cope and adjust better. Knowing the answer only gets you so far. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Davuzi Posted May 25, 2018 Report Share Posted May 25, 2018 Not sure... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bloodmancer Posted May 25, 2018 Report Share Posted May 25, 2018 Depends on who we are fighting and what our goal is. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.