Jump to content
World Warfare
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
  • advertisement_alt
Manson1975

Is diplomacy necessary in Tournament?

Is diplomacy necessary in tournament?  

42 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you think we should change diplomacy feature in tournament?

    • Yes, please remove it.
      29
    • No, leave it as it is.
      13


Recommended Posts

Commanders!

Your suggestions are very valuable to us, so feel free to share your ideas about tournament with us in the comments below! Help us create a fair, intense and challenging tournament battle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

It is not about diplomacy.  The format allows alternative accounts to be in the same battlefield.  If you want to fix it then show number of team sign up for tournament then randomize.  Also the other way is do one on one bracket.  You can increase the season time but double the rewards.

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I say remove diplomacy. How many tournaments allow teams to team up together. Most tournaments are supposed to be fair and equal to see which team is actually the best. Allowing teams to team up on other teams does not seem like a true tournament format unless it is 2v2v2 with rules set up in advance. 

  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think removing diplomacy will help a bit as alt leagues wont be able to feed main leagues with resources and armamnets nor support the main league with tactics.

However I doubt that it will solve the real concern of main and sister leagues entering a tourney together and still having 2/1 or 3/1 advantage. It will make it a bit harder to coordinate with the enforced fog of war due not being technically allied but they will still corrdinate attacks and crush the opposition with overwhelming numbers.

As someone suggested randomizing entry in conjuction with removing alliances may have a better ourcome. 

  • Upvote 3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd agree to this as it becomes annoying to see more than one league teaming up against a league which, doesn't have any ally while the hostile league has about maybe one to three ally or possibly neutral. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think diplomacy is good as long as it’s not a gang thing. Lol some leagues are just brutal and don’t give the newer leagues a chance

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I totally agree with the randomization.  You open the window for 48 hours, each league will hit a tick box saying they are playing, when the tourney begins, each team is assigned a map, when u get 4 players u can jump, you can add two afterwards

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

This would be a non-issue if there was a terms of service and rules section. NO ALTS or SISTER LEAGUE interaction and only one player per account should be a few of the rules addressed by Joycrafter immediately. No rules or tos makes this game unsavory. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Hitgirl said:

This would be a non-issue if there was a terms of service and rules section. NO ALTS or SISTER LEAGUE interaction and only one player per account should be a few of the rules addressed by Joycrafter immediately. No rules or tos makes this game unsavory. 

I think there should be certain exceptions to the "One player per account". I can't always log myself in due to work and a different time zone. I have a league m8 log me in.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

@Hitgirl In an ideal world I would agree entirely but the devs are smart enough to know they cant police alts and before you say "IP logging" its childs play these days to use a proxy server and get unlimited new IPs

Edited by Immel

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Immel, ips are not the only way to track an account.  They can put a stop to it but my guess they need the money they get from them.  Cup and other aspects of the game are becoming irrelevant to me because of the alts, sister leagues, shareded accounts, & other issues I won’t bore you with. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt they are getting much money from alts as they are only used for resource feeding the main account by most people thus no one buys gold, gems, or generals for his alt account. l fail to see how alts could be generating vast profits to the Devs...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Either way the ability to stop alts and shared accounts is within their abilities.  More players should care and be concerned that there isn’t a rules section and terms of service visible to them. We have no way of knowing if we are breaking rules or in violation.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

 To begin, let repaired ratings cups, a feeling that they are not always updated. Diplomacy will not change anything, unions can be broken. Winning the cup comes from other aspects of the game in particular Donate and Time. On the account of violas I do not know, but with them it is necessary to struggle

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 27-11-2017 at 10:34 AM, Manson1975 said:

Commanders!

Your suggestions are very valuable to us, so feel free to share your ideas about tournament with us in the comments below! Help us create a fair, intense and challenging tournament battle.

Even when u remove all dipomatie than players will be team up even if they are red both u can better make  tournaments like 2leaques vs 2 leaques or 1 leaque vs 1 leaque and fight your way up also it shount be hapening that players from silver cup go back to bronze cup in a new leaque 

Stay strong  and have funn thats the most important

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×