ColonelJJ Posted September 8, 2016 Report Share Posted September 8, 2016 On August 29, 2016 at 8:35 PM, Nonhuman said: Anti tanks suck Infantry with anti tank power Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nonhuman Posted September 9, 2016 Report Share Posted September 9, 2016 11 hours ago, ColonelJJ said: Infantry with anti tank power Still sucks Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColonelJJ Posted September 9, 2016 Report Share Posted September 9, 2016 11 hours ago, Nonhuman said: Still sucks It would be faster and why would it still suck that is really the only disadvantage to AT Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florian Posted September 9, 2016 Report Share Posted September 9, 2016 Much Eisner for a flamethrower guy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nonhuman Posted September 10, 2016 Report Share Posted September 10, 2016 4 hours ago, ColonelJJ said: It would be faster and why would it still suck that is really the only disadvantage to AT No, you don't understand, ATs are infantry. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BATTLEBATTLE Posted September 10, 2016 Author Report Share Posted September 10, 2016 Ate are infantry with AT guns Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColonelJJ Posted September 10, 2016 Report Share Posted September 10, 2016 12 hours ago, Nonhuman said: No, you don't understand, ATs are infantry. Yes but they are half as fast Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nonhuman Posted September 10, 2016 Report Share Posted September 10, 2016 30 minutes ago, ColonelJJ said: Yes but they are half as fast One third Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boredomfalls Posted September 11, 2016 Report Share Posted September 11, 2016 On September 10, 2016 at 0:08 PM, Nonhuman said: One third So you hand bazookas to infantry and because they're not dragging 400lb cannons they're faster. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Florian Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 Lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nonhuman Posted September 12, 2016 Report Share Posted September 12, 2016 (edited) 22 hours ago, Boredomfalls said: So you hand bazookas to infantry and because they're not dragging 400lb cannons they're faster. Yeah, but shooting range is 2/3 less. Edited September 12, 2016 by Nonhuman Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RichieRightNow2 Posted October 25, 2016 Report Share Posted October 25, 2016 Anti tank guns have more health, range, and damage as bazookas. Bazookas in WW2 had a short range, like 300 yards Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.