BATTLEBATTLE Posted July 31, 2016 Report Share Posted July 31, 2016 Flametank: less attack range, more attack vs. infantry only and less attack vs. other things, move more than regular tank, required lvl. 15 munitions factory, 20 mins. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waffles Posted August 1, 2016 Report Share Posted August 1, 2016 Interesting idea but kinda useless cuz infantry are already useless and prob the weakest troops in game. There is no point in making a counter for the weakest troop. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NinjaBlox Posted August 14, 2016 Report Share Posted August 14, 2016 Like a Pz. III auf E. That the Germans mounted a flamethrower on. Wouldn't it just be easier to make flamethrower infantry? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nonhuman Posted August 15, 2016 Report Share Posted August 15, 2016 On August 14, 2016 at 3:10 PM, NinjaBlox said: Like a Pz. III auf E. That the Germans mounted a flamethrower on. Wouldn't it just be easier to make flamethrower infantry? On July 31, 2016 at 7:08 PM, BATTLEBATTLE said: Flametank: less attack range, more attack vs. infantry only and less attack vs. other things, move more than regular tank, required lvl. 15 munitions factory, 20 mins. Yeah... I think I remember these... Yeah, they existed. This will not be easy for you, but there was not even 12 of these. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BATTLEBATTLE Posted August 16, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 16, 2016 But they could have a scre ability, doing more damage. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nonhuman Posted August 17, 2016 Report Share Posted August 17, 2016 15 hours ago, BATTLEBATTLE said: But they could have a scre ability, doing more damage. Ahh... What? I said, that it did not exist! Even the USSR could not afford a tank of this kind! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boredomfalls Posted August 23, 2016 Report Share Posted August 23, 2016 (edited) On August 17, 2016 at 0:05 AM, Nonhuman said: Ahh... What? I said, that it did not exist! Even the USSR could not afford a tank of this kind! The US had them while invading Japan. And yes Germany had them too. The confusion might be in the fact that it wasn't soley for flamethrowers. They replaced the interior machine gun with a heavy duty flamethrower and could still be used against tanks. Highly useless in this game though Edited August 23, 2016 by Boredomfalls 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nonhuman Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 20 hours ago, Boredomfalls said: The US had them while invading Japan. And yes Germany had them too. The confusion might be in the fact that it wasn't soley for flamethrowers. They replaced the interior machine gun with a heavy duty flamethrower and could still be used against tanks. Highly useless in this game though Sorry, I messed up, posted the last thingy of mine in the wrong place. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColonelJJ Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 On August 23, 2016 at 1:55 AM, Boredomfalls said: The US had them while invading Japan. And yes Germany had them too. The confusion might be in the fact that it wasn't soley for flamethrowers. They replaced the interior machine gun with a heavy duty flamethrower and could still be used against tanks. Highly useless in this game though They could have anti building power Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boredomfalls Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 4 hours ago, ColonelJJ said: They could have anti building power Then it throws off the balance. We already have stugs for that Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fariin Posted August 24, 2016 Report Share Posted August 24, 2016 They could fill an in between role, less damage than a stug but more health/armor. At level 15 it wouldn't be any use though, at that point I'm just maus spamming to the same effect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graywing Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 (edited) On August 24, 2016 at 4:01 PM, Boredomfalls said: Then it throws off the balance. We already have stugs for that Well saying how it is unlocked at level 15 it may be good more defense and Heath than a stug but less range Edited August 26, 2016 by Graywing Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BATTLEBATTLE Posted August 26, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 We could have infantry bazooka unit with lvl 13 munition factory and 10 minute training time each. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nonhuman Posted August 26, 2016 Report Share Posted August 26, 2016 14 minutes ago, BATTLEBATTLE said: We could have infantry bazooka unit with lvl 13 munition factory and 10 minute training time each. I suggested it before. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColonelJJ Posted August 30, 2016 Report Share Posted August 30, 2016 On August 26, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Nonhuman said: I suggested it before. Anti tank power Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nonhuman Posted August 30, 2016 Report Share Posted August 30, 2016 7 minutes ago, ColonelJJ said: Anti tank power Anti tanks suck Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barthel Posted August 30, 2016 Report Share Posted August 30, 2016 What about half tracks? Troops transport with a machine gun. Less damage and speed than the recon vehicle but more than infantry. Could transport like 3-4 infantry and possibly resupply nearby troops but only carry a max of like 50 or 100 supplies. Maybe some armament along those lines 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BATTLEBATTLE Posted August 30, 2016 Author Report Share Posted August 30, 2016 3 hours ago, Barthel said: What about half tracks? Troops transport with a machine gun. Less damage and speed than the recon vehicle but more than infantry. Could transport like 3-4 infantry and possibly resupply nearby troops but only carry a max of like 50 or 100 supplies. Maybe some armament along those lines Sounds good. Adding a infantry truck and a supply truck with defenses sound good. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GPGamers Posted August 30, 2016 Report Share Posted August 30, 2016 The tank would be strong against large numbers of infantry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GPGamers Posted August 30, 2016 Report Share Posted August 30, 2016 5 hours ago, Barthel said: What about half tracks? Troops transport with a machine gun. Less damage and speed than the recon vehicle but more than infantry. Could transport like 3-4 infantry and possibly resupply nearby troops but only carry a max of like 50 or 100 supplies. Maybe some armament along those lines Would be perfect would have to go faster than infantry. Also some half tracks had heavy armor. Many half tracks also transported 6 or more infantry at a time. This allowing you to transport two squads of infantry at a time, move fast and have some what armor Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.