Dishonorable tactics

[Genrizza]

So I see regularly in battlefields people complain if someone abandons their city, saying its cowardly and dishonorable.

but bomber-spamming isn't?  

[Waffles]

7 hours ago, Genrizza said:

So I see regularly in battlefields people complain if someone abandons their city, saying its cowardly and dishonorable.

but bomber-spamming isn't?  

It's a tactic. Just a gameplay thing. 

[Genrizza]

4 hours ago, Waffles said:

It's a tactic. Just a gameplay thing. 

Ah, I see.

[BATTLEBATTLE]

There are no rules of war. Noting is dishonorable in warfare.

[NinjaBlox]

If you really think about it, all it takes is 5 or 6 fighters to completely ruin a bomber attack.

[Waffles]

On August 14, 2016 at 6:36 AM, NinjaBlox said:

If you really think about it, all it takes is 5 or 6 fighters to completely ruin a bomber attack.

Bombers are already one of the more op troops in the game. I'm perfectly fine if they don't get another advantage for them to be used en masse.... Lol

[5hifty]

I think one thing that might please the masses is if you could select the units you want your turrets to target. Bombers are primarily meat shields to draw fire from ground units. Not to mention, turrets are least effective against aircraft, so it's a perfect storm when the bombers arrive.